web analytics

Alone on a Crowded Sea

February 18, 2013 in Community Wisdom, Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

photo
I can remember the first time the Internet became part of my life as a special needs parent.

The afternoon that Schuyler was finally diagnosed with polymicrogyria, her neurologist warned us. “I know when you get home, the first thing you’re going to do is go online and look this up,” she said. “I just want you to be ready. It’s going to be pretty rough.” She wasn’t kidding. At that time, the only information online was very clinical. Most of it was written in that horrible medical moon-man language, but the parts that were comprehensible were very scary boo. Worst case scenarios, mostly.

If Schuyler had been diagnosed a few years later, I might have found the world to be a little more comforting, and informative. I would have found at least one support group LISTSERV, and a few years after that, I would have found groups for polymicrogyria families and groups for apraxia and other related neurological disorders on Facebook. Most of all, I would have discovered other parents sharing their experiences.

I would have found what would feel very much like community.

I can also remember, all too vividly, when I discovered how fragile that sense of community can be, and how quickly it could devolve into factionalism and tribalism. I learned how extreme the disability community can be, and how eager it can be to devour its own. How it’s often much less a community and much more a collection of interests, self-protective and nearsighted.

It’s a lesson that many of us discover, whether we are parents or family or persons with disabilities. We find that the idea of community means very different things to different people, and that it is much easier to insist on our positions and to shout down those with other perspectives, ones that we don’t share and therefore don’t value.

I remember when I learned that the disability community can be so insular, so walled off, so protective of its spot on a perceived high ground that it’s honestly not much of a community at all.

I’ve been watching that community eat itself again recently, although honestly, it’s never hard to find a fight. In the past year, I’ve retreated from that larger community, and have stayed away from the parts that don’t concern me or my daughter. If it were just me, that would be fine, I’d write it off as a product of my own bad personality or whatever. But when I talk to the friends I’ve made in that community, I find the same observation, the same retreat. And among both parents and persons with disabilities, I’ve found something very much like a commonality, small but real.

When enough people feel that they are alone again, alone in the midst of a large and diverse community that is hell bent on self-immolation, then I’m not sure that “community” is still the correct term to use.

But here’s the thing that has happened, for myself and others, and if I were advising parents who are new to this whole world, it’s the thing I would advise them to concentrate on. Even as I’ve discovered how isolating the larger disability community can be, I’ve found that the individual friends I’ve made have become stones on which I can build something. We’ve also found real lasting value in those communities that have very real connections to my own family, in our case those built around assistive communication technology and neurological conditions like polymicrogyria and microcephaly.

Mostly I’ve come to realize that the individual advocacy in which I engage on on my daughter’s behalf is the most important work I can set myself to. More than that, it is through that small advocacy that I can build something larger, something better and more lasting.

I once believed that a larger sense of community would benefit us all, that the rising tide raises all the boats, etc. I don’t think I believe that anymore, not entirely. The Internet makes it feel like there are a lot of us in the same boat, but perhaps it’s more like there are a great many little boats bobbing around in the same dark sea. And perhaps that’s the best we can hope for. Tend your little boat, and find the friends with whom you can tie onto for a time and help each other.

And remember that we really aren’t alone. Not entirely, and not in the ways that matter.

————-

150x150_adMabelsLabelsThank you to Mabel’s Labels for their sponsorship this month! Be sure to connect with them…

Mabel’s Labels site, Twitter, Facebook, andtheir blog! Subscribe to their newsletter here. 

Did you know that Mabel’s Labels can help you fundraise? Check it out here!

What are Preschool Shoe Labels? Help your toddlers learn left from right AND label their shoes with their names!

The Quiet Place

December 3, 2012 in Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

I had a bad week. I’m not going to go into the details of why, because they’re not really relevant here, and I do occasionally like to pretend I have a little privacy. What’s important is simply that there was something not so bad about the badness of this week. If that makes sense.

It was a bad week, but not because of my daughter’s disability.

It’s probably easy to imagine from the outside that being the parent of a child with a disability means a constant awareness of the specific challenges. Always being “on”, always thinking about it, ever vigilant. And I am all too aware that for many families, that’s exactly how it is. But the truth is, I spend the vast majority of my dad time as Schuyler’s father. When specific issues come up, then I become Disability Dad, I suppose. But really, most of the time, parenting Schuyler is much simpler, and much more personal. Honestly, I mostly think about it when I’m writing.

With Schuyler, the disability pieces become part of that parenting autopilot. When she’s unable to make herself understood clearly, we don’t suddenly start going down some communications checklist. It happens on the fly, and while it’s going on, our thoughts aren’t “Let us now begin the usual series of items we have learned in order to facilitate our child’s communication.” We just go into that place, casually and without changing the beats of the conversation. Sometimes, when I can’t understand Schuyler and I can feel her becoming frustrated, I’ll pretend to misunderstand her in a funny way. “I have a chicken on my head? What?” It cracks her up, diffuses the scene and slows everyone down enough to figure out what she’s saying.

When it happens, it doesn’t feel like an exercise in disability management. It’s just what you do when you’re in Schuyler’s life.

Looking back on a bad week usually means reflecting on what failure occurred to hand some victory, significant or otherwise, to Schuyler’s monster. Was it my failure? Julie’s? A teacher’s? Was it Schuyler’s failure, one of the ones that inevitably occur from time to time with anyone who has as many cards stacked against her as she does? I never feel quite as much like a disability parent as I do during that post-mortem, nor do I usually feel like such a fool and a travesty of fatherhood at very many other times, either. Bad days, bad weeks, they usually tend to end in a series of “I’ll do better next time” statements.

But in the awful week I just had, Schuyler became something else, the thing that she usually is for me, much more than I probably am for her. She became comfort. Refuge. Shelter from the storm. And as I reflect on the people in my life, the situations in which I can count on others and the ones in which I need to find a little GPS in my own soul to get out safely, as I ponder my own disposability in this world, it is to the quiet moments with Schuyler that I return. She knows it, too. In times like these, she is quick to take my hand, to lean over in the car and put her head on my shoulder. She has a sense of when I need love, and she has never failed me in that respect.

So despite the hardness of the week just past, my lingering feelings are of calm. My touchstone memories of the past few days are of watching television or playing Mariokart with Schuyler or walking the aisles at Toys R Us on a Saturday afternoon because, well, why not? It could have been a time of feeling alone and hurt and cast off. Instead, I spent the past several days playing with a nervous but happy baby chinchilla named Frida, and watching my little girl fall in love with her as well. Some of our quiet moments weren’t actually quiet at all, not in a traditional sense. Chill time with Schuyler can be remarkably chaotic.

But in the loud part of my soul, I am quiet when I’m with Schuyler. She settles the emotional hurricane with a laugh. She turns down the fires with the simple act of curling up next to her father on the couch, and with wide eyes and astonished hushed whispers as a little chinchilla sits in her outstretched palms.

It was a very bad week. But I wouldn’t trade its quiet ending for anything.

————-

Visit the blog of Build-A-Bear Workshop, where co-founder shares her family’s story. Build-A-Bear has graciously supported this community during 2012!

It’s Complicated

November 26, 2012 in Community Wisdom, Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

“So, this is my life. And I want you to know that I am both happy and sad and I’m still trying to figure out how that could be.” – Stephen Chbosky, The Perks of Being a Wallflower

It happened again last night. I had the dream I’ve been having for almost a decade now, since the summer of 2003, when Schuyler was diagnosed with Congenital Bilateral Perisylvian Syndrome, now known to the world of medicine as Bilateral Perisylvian Polymicrogyria and to the world of Schuyler as her monster.

I dreamed that Schuyler spoke to me, in a voice as clear as the ringing of a bell, a voice I’ve never quite heard like that but which I suspect I’d recognize in an instant just the same.

I’ve had this dream so many times. I couldn’t begin to count them. They began the very night of her diagnosis, after we’d faced a hard reality, the one in which she would almost certainly never speak, or even come close. In that dream, and in the countless ones that followed, she said the same thing. She told me that everything was going to be okay.

Dream Schuyler was right. Things haven’t been easy, but they’re okay.

As Schuyler has grown older and her prognosis has changed, the dreams have changed, too, The dire predictions about her speech turned out to be only partially correct. Schuyler’s words can still be hard to understand, sometimes impossible, and her consonants haven’t actually improved much over the years. But her inflections are perfect, and she gets by with less trouble than you might imagine. As Real Schuyler’s vocalizations have improved over the years, Dream Schuyler has had more to say, and with a voice that I imagine is fairly close to the one she’s been denied but which she herself probably hears clearly in her head when she speaks.

When I awaken from these dreams, my emotions are… complicated.

There’s a lot about raising Schuyler that is complicated. That’s true of any special needs parent/child relationship. It might be one of the few universal truths in an otherwise ridiculously diverse breadth of experience in the disability community. The discussion of what we want for our kids has been one that has grown incredibly contentious over the past year or so, which is a shame. Anything that causes us to fight with each other makes us smaller and less empowered as a community, at least in my opinion, but it’s an important and emotion-filled topic. I wish it could be more nuanced, but I think I understand why it’s not.

The question is itself complicated. I’ve been asked before; perhaps every parent of a different child has been at some point. If you could take Schuyler’s disability away from her, would you do it? You talk about fighting her monster; what if you could actually defeat it? And if you could give her a life that had never been marked by disability, if you could wish her a neurotypical mind all the way back, would you do so?

The cure question. It’s one that starts a lot of fights, and yet it’s not the same question for everyone. It perhaps feels very different to the parent of an autistic child or a kid with Down syndrome than it does to the mother or father of a child with cerebral palsy or microcephaly, with organ failure or severe epilepsy. And even among these groups, you’ll find no agreement. Some parents accept their children’s disability as an integral part of who they are, even if it threatens their lives. Others hope for a cure that will give their children a shot at a typical life, regardless of the danger or the lethality of those children’s disabilities.

There’s no right or wrong answer. No position of greater love than the other. Like everything else in this alternate world of disability, it’s not that simple. It’s not even remotely so.

As for myself, my own answer to that question should be clear by now. I’d do anything to give Schuyler the thing she wants most of all. I’d sacrifice my own health and my own future to calm her monster, to smooth her far-too-wrinkled brain, to ease her seizures and clear her clouded mind, and most of all to untie her tongue. Schuyler dreams of being like any other girl her age, teetering on the brink of her teen years but occupying a spot in it uniquely her own. She’s ambulatory enough to move in that neurotypical world, and she understands it enough to reach for it. But it eludes her, sometimes with a brush of her fingertips against her goals and dreams. Schuyler reaches for it, but she never quite grasps it, and it breaks her little heart.

So no, I’m not personally a believer in acceptance or neurodiversity, but only for Schuyler. I don’t have an opinion on your relationship with your disabled kids, or your own relationship as a disabled person with your neurotypical parents. And I shouldn’t.

Because yes. It’s complicated. It’s more complicated than I know how to process sometimes, just in the face of my one daughter with her broken but beautiful brain. It’s far too complicated for me to think about where anyone else’s situation is concerned.

When Schuyler awoke this morning, she found me sitting alone, quietly. She climbed in my lap and put her head on my shoulder, and we sat that way for a while in the morning’s gathering light. Not sad. Just quiet. She asked me the same thing she does most mornings.

“What did you dream about, Daddy-o?”

“I dreamed about you,” I said. “I dreamed you were talking to me.”

“What was I talking about?” She asked, her hand moving to her throat as she pondered the idea of speaking.

“Nothing bad,” I said. “You were telling me all about chinchillas!” (We’ve been talking about getting a chinchilla for my birthday, and so our conversations have been pretty much All Things Chinchilla lately.) She liked that.

“Do you ever talk in your dreams?” I asked her.

She gave it some thought. “No,” she finally answered.

“You never talk in your dreams?” I asked.

“No, I don’t think so. But I want to talk like everyone else.”

“I know you do, Scout. I do, too.”

“But I’m okay, Daddy-o!” And with that, she was in her happy place again.

Schuyler knows what she can’t do, and she wishes things were otherwise. I don’t think that’s ever not true, not for a few years now. It is complicated, for her as well. If there’s one way that Schuyler is turning out to be exactly like her father, it might just be her innate understanding that our joy and our anxiety walk together. Not as friends, not exactly. But perhaps as family.

Like I said, it’s complicated.

————

Visit Build-A-Workshop’s blog, where co-founder Julia Roberts shares her family’s journey with special needs.

Portrait of a Real Girl

October 8, 2012 in Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

It started with a school portrait.

Like many school districts, Schuyler’s school hired a photographer who requires parents to pay for a photo package before the photo is even taken, much less before we get a chance to see a proof. This feels like a scam to me, especially after working for a few years as a freelance photographer and seeing firsthand exactly how ridiculous the profit margin can be for a studio. But they ensure that profit by making you prepay, and it must be a pretty smart move since I’m as distrustful and curmudgeonly as they come, and I ponied up for a photo package like a chump.

The photo came home this week, and yeah. Schuyler has had some questionable school portraits, but this one was unusually scary. Her eyes were doing something strange and asymmetrical. Her mouth was pinched up like she was eating a lemon. And she had pushed her hair back over her ears in a way that resulted in these weird little wings.

It could have been worse; it wasn’t actually a terrible photo. But it didn’t look like Schuyler much at all, so much so that Julie wondered if perhaps she’d had a seizure. I didn’t think so; Schuyler didn’t appear vacant or distressed like she does when she’s post-ictal. But she looked odd, which made it a bad photo.

Schuyler and I talked about the photo, which she actually liked (although mostly because she was making a funny face and was amused by that), and I wrote about it on Twitter. I didn’t pull any punches, either about how I reacted to the photo or how Schuyler felt about it.

The tweet came almost immediately.

“ur a f***ing a******. If she likes the foto then fine. My kid is nonverbal PDD. wish she could tell me she even f***ing liked her pic.”

That little bit of “disability olympics” was just the opening salvo, too. This person sent tweet after tweet, each one fouler than the last, all telling me how I was mocking my child, that I was trashing her pride in her photo, and that I was as a result representative of several on a list of graphic insults, ranging from one particular body part (complete with a repeated hashtag identifying such) to someone who commits a very specific act to another very specific body part. She didn’t just eschew the high road; she dug a tunnel under the low road and built a subway system. It was remarkable, especially after she inexplicably changed her tune to post her phone number so we could talk about it. Well. I didn’t see that one coming.

(I declined to make that phone call. I’m such a pill.)

It wasn’t upsetting, but it did highlight something that I see frequently, both directed my way and at other special needs parents who write about their lives with their children. It’s the idea that Schuyler’s interactions with me must be devoid of complexity, that her needs and desires and opinions are those of a simple caricature, and that I, as her father, am either too clueless to see this or too cruel to care.

Schuyler’s intent isn’t discernible, so a random internet person feels free to fill that space with her worst assumptions. My daughter ceases to be a person and becomes a blank canvas, waiting to be filled with whatever the person wants to express. Schuyler’s not a person. She’s an opportunity. And in that respect, she is like every kid with a disability whose parents write about them and their situation. Our kids don’t receive the benefit of the doubt; they’re not assumed to be complex human beings with their own thoughts and feelings and desires. They’re objects of pity.

Except they’re not.

I’ve never been one to sugarcoat things, either when I’m writing about Schuyler or (more importantly) when I’m talking to her. At one point, the poster challenged me to read our tweets to Schuyler. I called her over to the computer and did so, giving her the cleaned up for television version. Then I asked her if she wanted to respond for herself. She laughed and sat down at the computer.

“My picture is funny and cool! my daddy is so awesome! don”t be mean to my daddy or you are a BUTTHEAD!”

Schuyler isn’t a delicate flower, and she’s not a victim of her condition. She’s a complex, opinionated and funny kid who can (and frequently does) laugh at herself. She’s not who she is because of her condition, but neither is she this complicated and cool person despite it. To treat her and kids like her as if they are causes rather than people is to diminish them, deeply.

And she’s as fiercely protective of her father as I am of her. She knows a butthead when she sees one.

———

Please visit Build-A-Bear Workshop’s blog, where site co-founder shares her daughter’s story a well as facilitates a traveling bear who visits special needs families around the world!

Sometimes He Does

October 1, 2012 in Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

I ran across a tough story recently. Veronica Galbraith, a single mother of a teenaged boy with Autism in the UK committed suicide after she was compelled to put her son into care when she found herself unable to cope with his behavioral issues. There have been a lot of news reports of parents who hurt, abandon or even kill their kids with disabilities, and the tendency of the media to express a lot of sympathy for the parents, often at the expense of the murdered offspring, has caused a lot of well-justified anxiety among the disability community.

But the story of Veronica Galbraith feels a little different, and it gives us the opportunity to examine the lives of parents of kids with disabilities with a renewed sense of purpose. Galbraith seemed to have had other issues, to be sure, with the death of her brother and some other serious family issues as well. And she appears to have had some pretty serious mental and emotional (and possibly alcohol-related) problems, too. So once again, saying she was overwhelmed with her caregiving responsibilities probably presents an oversimplification. The report seems to suggest that while her son’s behavioral challenges were more than she could handle, it was likely the loss of him in her home and her inability to help him that brought her to the point of suicide. And as almost always is the case, a lack of a solid support environment almost certainly exacted a terrible toll on her.

The thing is, however, that these external stressors aren’t mitigating circumstances. They aren’t beside the point. They ARE the point. I follow a great many special needs parents online, mostly on Twitter, and the stories I read every day paint pictures of families for whom disability often only complicates, albeit significantly so, a litany of issues ranging from irritating to tragic. We don’t spend every minute of every day dealing with disability challenges, but because those challenges are omnipresent, we are always special needs parents, regardless of whether the monster is driving at that particular moment or not.

In our desire to present real life situations as parables, there is a very real danger of creating narratives that are ultimately inaccurate. Parents do not care for our kids in a purely good or evil way, and we don’t approach those kids with a monolithic philosophy. The truth almost always lies in a grey area, in a place where parents care much more than they are given credit for, but screw up more frequently and dramatically than anyone really sees. I believe that the majority of special needs parents don’t dehumanize their kids. But most of us prove all too human ourselves.

I love my daughter, and I think about her constantly. I spend a lot of time with my stomach twisted in anxiety, but I spend a pretty large amount of time exalting over her victories both large and small. When things are going well, I feel the latter more than the former. Things often don’t go that well, but I get it right enough to sleep at night and wake up the next day ready to try to do better. Through a fog of selfish choices and uninformed choices and outright terrible choices, I occasionally get it right. Those moments of success come at just the right intervals to keep going, like lily pads for a leaping frog.

When I read the story of someone like Veronica Galbraith, I don’t wonder if she got it wrong more than she got it right, but rather if she BELIEVED she got it wrong too much. And I realize, and remind myself when necessary, that the secret to successful parenting isn’t just about educating yourself, or listening closely to what your kids are trying to tell you, or fighting the good fight like a steely-eyed warrior. Those are vital points, to be sure. But none of that happens if you lose heart, or if you convince yourself that you really can’t show up for work the next morning.

There’s a saying that every special needs parent has heard at some point, rivaling the Holland Thing for frequency of appearance in our inbox. “God never gives you more than you can handle.” But we know better. Sometimes he does.

——

Another member’s (Shannon Dingle) view on the God and What You Can Handle concept.

Julia’s view on What God Gives Us…

Be sure to visit Build-A-Bear Workshop’s blog…where site co-founder blogs about her daughter’s journey with special needs as well as a traveling bear’s story of visits around the world.

Possibilities

September 17, 2012 in Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

The other day, during our now-regular Friday lunch visit with Schuyler at her school, we spoke to one of the school administrators. She had something she wanted to bounce off of us.

“Do you think Schuyler would be interested in being a cheerleader next year?”

Well, now. That’s an interesting idea.

Briefly stated, Schuyler possesses a brain that doesn’t work like most, not even the brains of other people with Bilateral Perisylvian Polymicrogyria, her particular monster. Schuyler’s manifestation of PMG, unique in all the world according to the leading researcher in her field, presents itself primarily as a developmental delay and a pretty serious speech impairment. Schuyler can’t speak, not like most kids and not with much clarity, and her understanding of the world around her is extremely naive and without much in the way of nuance.

In some ways, she is like any twelve year-old girl, and in others, she is even wise beyond her years. But while she is making progress academically and is fighting the good fight as far as keeping up with her mainstream classmates is concerned, in some very significant ways Schuyler moves through the world in confusion. Her speech is weird and hard to follow sometimes, at least until you know her well, and the thoughts she is trying so hard to express aren’t always what you might expect. If every kid is a special, unique snowflake, Schuyler is a very odd snowflake indeed. A purple one, with blinking LED lights, perhaps.

To say that Schuyler joining the cheerleading squad was not an option that had naturally occurred to any of us might be an understatement.

As we got more information, it became less of a daunting thought. In my youth, the cheerleading squad was a gathering of a very specific kind of kid. They weren’t just the popular kids, although they were very much that. They were the über-popular kids, the ones who showed up at school every day in the shiniest, fanciest cars arriving directly from Valhalla. They were the ones who only spoke to each other and their courtiers, and they were often the meanest of the mean girls. Mean, but perfect. I was no shrinking nerd in school; I had a fairly diverse group of friends in band and in my classes. But I can say with absolute certainty that in all my years in junior high and high school, I never exchanged so much as a word with any of the cheerleaders, at least not after they joined the squad. I don’t know that it would have ever even occurred to me to try.

But apparently things have changed in this brave new world, at least at Schuyler’s school. Eighth graders can sign up for the squad and learn the routines, and if they show up for auditions, they are generally accepted. There are about twenty of them, sounding more like a spirit squad than cheerleaders. The faculty advisor who runs the squad is apparently an extremely laid back person (in my mind, I always imagine the cheerleading advisor as Violet Beauregarde’s mom in the remake of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory), and I can’t imagine Schuyler’s teacher would have said anything to us about this without having a pretty good idea that it would be okay with the faculty sponsor.

“Of course, Schuyler might not be able to do the cheers,” she said diplomatically, “but I’m sure she would be great at the routines and the dancing. And I’ll bet she would just love it.”

And she would.

With Schuyler, it’s always a challenge, identifying the things that present real possibilities for her. As parents, we take the official party line of “anything is possible if you just believe, by golly”, but as parents of a different child, we are accustomed to a delicate dance, the one where we try to open as many doors as possible for her while at the same time gently working to avoid the ones that don’t easily accommodate her broken parts. Schuyler will probably not join the speech club, or drama, or any academic groups. She won’t take foreign language classes, challenged enough by mastering English in a reasonably communicative way (speaking, as she does, in a dialect that she shares with no other human in the world).

And as wonderful as she is, Schuyler will always be a deeply weird kid. Too weird for the likes of the cheerleading squad, or at least so I would have thought.

But maybe not. Maybe I’m selling her short. Perhaps my fear of watching her fail at this most social of endeavors, at a time that social interactions are already giving her fits, maybe that fear has caused me to step cautiously when I should be helping her to leap fearlessly.

It’s probably a purely academic issue. After all, if we’re still living in Texas by the time Schuyler enters the eighth grade, that will mean that things have gone terribly wrong with our Chicago plans. And once we’ve moved, I’m certainly not so pollyanna that I think that every school in America has replaced the Mean Girls’ Cheer Squad with the Inclusive Spirit Group.

But the possibilities remain, if only someone else is creative enough to make them available, and if we’re brave enough to take the chance, to risk one more giant heartbreak if it might mean a chance for friendships and acceptance, which are the currency of her twelve year-old world.

They walk among us!

September 10, 2012 in Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

(WASHINGTON DC) – Noted cryptozoologist and science blogger Dr. Garth Pooht has released a paper in the science journal Stuff About Stuff that hopes to debunk once and for all the rumored existence of the mythological cryptid known as “the special needs father”.

“I’ve done extensive research on this matter,” said Dr. Pooht, from his office in his mother’s basement, “and despite the persistence of rumors claiming that there are fathers out there who actually get involved in the education, therapy and care of their children with disabilities, the internet-based evidence strongly suggests that these cases are so rare as to make the consistent existence of this creature extremely unlikely. Many of these reported incidents no doubt represent cases of ‘feel good about dad’ stories from special needs moms, who as we know are the only truly vital caretakers in the lives of these kids. And some may be intentionally perpetrating this hoax.”

Dr. Pooht, the acclaimed author of My Dinner with Bigfoot and Jet Skiing on Loch Ness, does not discount the possibility that in extremely rare cases, special needs fathers may occasionally step up to complete simple tasks, provided that they have been given detailed and repeated instructions on how to do so by their spouses. “You would be surprised at some of the basic commands some of the more clever fathers can learn, with a lot of patience and hard work from the mother. But as always, it is mostly a testament to the near superhuman strength and skill of the special needs mother that can very occasionally compel the father of the species to get off the couch and do anything. And of course, this is virtually unheard of during football season.”

Dr. Pooht will be signing copies of his books at the Kinkos on 17th and Elm on Sunday at 4 pm.


AUTHORIZED WIRETAP TRANSCRIPT,
MYTHOLOGICAL CREATURES FRIDAY NIGHT POKER GAME
(excerpt)

BIGFOOT: So yeah, I am so tired of the blurry photos. Can I just say?

LOCH NESS MONSTER: Aye, don’t even get me started. Don’t any of these new camera phones have the capability to focus?

BIGFOOT: Right? Did you see the last one in the Inquirer? Not flattering. It made my butt look like a beanbag. Please tell me I don’t look like that.

YETI: No way, man. The camera adds a couple hundred pounds. And the fur. Hey, who’s the new guy?

SPECIAL NEEDS DAD: Hey, everyone. Thanks for letting me in on the game.

LOCH NESS MONSTER: Not a problem. We had a spot open up after Chupacabra got spotted passed out on the beach and went back to rehab.

YETI: That dude’s got a problem. Fame has messed him up.

BIGFOOT: So what’s your beef this week? We like to talk shop. It’s hard, being a cryptid.

SPECIAL NEEDS DAD: You mean besides the usual string of online articles about how special needs mothers are doing God’s work, all by themselves? And the dearth of writing at all about special needs fathers? Google “special needs moms” and “special needs dads” and see what you get. I only WISH someone would take a blurry picture of me at my kid’s IEP meeting.

BIGFOOT: Wait, you go to those? I didn’t think fathers were even allowed.

SPECIAL NEEDS DAD: That’s the thing. I’ve been to every single one of those meetings, along with every single doctor’s visit and every therapy session. I spent two nights in the hospital with my kid, I never left the room. And every time, every SINGLE time, I get that look that says “What are you doing here?”

YETI: I get that a lot during the Everest climbing season.

SPECIAL NEEDS DAD: If I go up to the school and meet with a teacher, I get handed instructions and reports and told to “give these to Mom and tell her blah blah blah.” Same thing when I call for tech support for my daughter’s assistive tech. “Oh, Mom must be busy saving the world. When she comes down from Valhalla next time, show her how to reset the system.”

YETI: Dude. You’ve kind of got some issues.

LOCH NESS MONSTER: No, I totally get it. That’s not right. Do they ever come at you in wee little submarines?

SPECIAL NEEDS DAD: Well, no. Not really. But still. Last time I had to go find my own chair.

BIGFOOT: Man, I totally get how you feel. You’re suffering from a persistent narrative. I get the same thing. Have you seen my Wikipedia entry? “Bigfoot is commonly reported to have a strong, unpleasant smell by those who claim to have encountered it.” Really? That’s just hurtful.

LOCH NESS MONSTER: I got called a piece of driftwood.

YETI: I’m still trying to live down that Bass-Rankin “Bumble” thing.

SPECIAL NEEDS DAD: How do you guys keep doing what you do? This is starting to wear me down a little.

BIGFOOT: The thing you have to do is remember why you’re doing what you do, and just keep doing it, regardless of the narrative. I mean, it’s not like special needs moms don’t deserve the good press, right?

SPECIAL NEEDS DAD: Of course, they’re awesome!

BIGFOOT: Exactly. Think of yourself as the invisible partner in all this. It does’t matter what society thinks of you. It doesn’t change what your kid knows, or how your family functions, right? Like, I read how one photo of me was actually a bear with mange.

YETI: Ouch.

BIGFOOT: Yeah. Did that sting? Of course it did. I work hard on this coat. I like to think of myself as possessing rich, buttery fur.

SPECIAL NEEDS DAD: It is very nice.

BIGFOOT: Thanks. And I have to have the self-confidence to know that, despite what others may think. I’m not just going to let myself go and stop scaring campers just because someone doesn’t appreciate my hair care regimen. Are you out there, fighting just as hard for your kid? You know you are. And I’ll bet you could rattle off a list of other special needs dads who do the same thing. Just because that social narrative says you’re Homer Simpson doesn’t mean that you are. You guys should just keep doing what you’re doing.

YETI: Hey, are we going to talk all night, or are we going to play poker?

LOCH NESS MONSTER: Just once, I wish we could play Twister or something. I can barely even hold my cards with these stupid little fins.

————-

Be sure to check out site co-founder Julia Roberts’ posts about her daughter and Champerina and about traveling Champ on Build-A-Bear Workshop‘s blog! They are a huge supporter of this special needs community!

Giving

August 14, 2012 in Community Wisdom, Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

I’ve been thinking of the things I’ve given my daughter. And of all the things I want to give her, and will give her. And the things I’ll never be able to give her.

I’ve often written here that the only things I can promise to give Schuyler is love and the truth, and that remains true. She can always count on that, no matter how badly I might stumble otherwise. And I will stumble. I’ll make poor choices, and I’ll miss some of the big things. I’ll fail Schuyler, as I’ve failed her so many times before, but she can always count on me to love her, and to tell her the truth. My truth, and the larger truth as far as I’m able.

I try to give her more. I’m not just talking about advocacy, either. Obviously I try to give her a world where she might succeed despite her monster, a way to move through that world with confidence, and with the ability to communicate despite her very different brain and her very broken words. Society isn’t ready for her or the likes of her, so I advocate, I write and try my best to make her real to that world, to show that she’s authentic, a whole person with the same expectations and the same possibilities as any of her neurotypical peers.

But I attempt to give Schuyler some kind of normal, too. I have always tried to give her humor, which isn’t hard to do at all, because she has an easy laugh and is genuinely a very funny person. (Her current favorite is a knock knock joke, but it’s one that we spring on someone else starting their own joke. Question: “Knock knock.” Answer: “Come in!”) I’ve never spoken to her like a child, and I never will.

I try to give Schuyler what she craves the most. New experiences, a break from routine that borders on chaos. I try to introduce her to enough new people and new situations that she might just be distracted from the fact that she doesn’t have friends, that her school and her peers don’t get her, that her community won’t be able to let her live independently. I try to protect her from things that will ultimately be hers and hers alone to face.

I already gave her a genetic gift that turned out to be a gag gift, and despite all that I understand about that, I still feel inexplicably guilty for that. It’s a thing I need to make up to her, and I will spend the rest of my days attempting to do just that. I try to give her the encouragement to be the person she is, regardless of her challenges, which are many, or her difference, which is very great.

What can I give her? What can I as a father, and a friend, give to Schuyler? I honestly don’t know for sure. I’ve failed her so many times, but I’ve gotten it right sometimes, too. We’ve chased schools as we’ve looked for the perfect solution, but we’ve learned the hard way what a fool’s errand that is for a kid like her. Now we’re chasing the right community, looking for a better place, a place she can make her own.

And we’re giving her something like a sibling, and something like an expanded family.

I don’t know what I can give to her. Not a comfortable life of easy living, but then, I’m not sure that’s what she needs anyway. Not a life of unfailing wisdom, but I’d rather her watch me fail and make bad choices and occasionally disappoint, and if she sees all that and knows the person I am, and she loves me anyway, then it’s no longer about what I can give to her.

If she loves me in all my imperfection, than I’m the one who receives a gift. And not a small one, either.

The Grownups

July 2, 2012 in Community Wisdom, Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

I had the privilege of attending the 2012 AAC-RERC State of the Science Conference in Baltimore last week. It was eye-opening, mostly because with very few exceptions (like me, mostly), the folks in attendance were assistive technology professionals rather than consumers or parent advocates. It was a little like sneaking under the grownups’ table and listening in on the conversations.

That analogy feels especially appropriate, actually, in light of some of those conversations. As you might expect, there were a great many discussions concerning the use of the iPad and other consumer electronics products as assistive communication hardware in place of the older generation of expensive and frankly unwieldy dedicated speech devices. In a conference dedicated to the future of assisted communication, this was entirely appropriate. What was interesting to me, however, was how in the midst of a lot of new thinking, I heard frequent expression of some very old thinking, too.

Look. I get that this is a scary time for speech language professionals. The democratization of the AAC evaluation and decision-making process has thrown the industry in something of a tailspin. That process has, in the past, been largely driven by experts in the field. Funding and implementation decisions have always been in their hands, leaving parents and teachers and especially end users to trust and to hope that the recommendations that come from those experts will be accurate and appropriate. And I feel confident in assuming that in most cases, they are.

As we learned with Schuyler in 2005, however, in some cases, the experts get it very, very wrong. And when they do, those of us who must live with the results of their expert decisions don’t always have a great deal of recourse.

The revolution in consumer electronics choices is a game changer in that respect. To hear many speech language professionals, however, you could be forgiven for thinking that this democratization is a dangerous development. Over and over at the conference, I heard how parents were just running out and buying iPads, downloading the newest and shiniest AAC apps and then just expecting therapists to somehow “make it work” with their kids. Parents, that most ridiculous and pollyannish group in the process, we’re screwing it up for everyone by daring to make decisions for our kids, decisions that some of these experts believe are ill-informed. We’re like children ourselves, suddenly freed from the restrictions wisely placed on us by grownups. I actually heard one speech language professional invoke Lord of the Flies. I’m not even kidding.

And here’s the thing. I’m sure that happens, and not infrequently. But in the same way that it would be unfair for me to assume that because one assistive technology expert failed Schuyler so miserably at a pivotal time in her development, therefore they are useless as a profession, I think it’s a mistake to dismiss the work of parent advocates on behalf of their kids because you’ve dealt with some whose desperation and lack of information has led them down paths that aren’t productive. It would be a worst mistake to convince yourself that because of this, new and accessible technologies are a dead end for the future of assistive technology.

I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating. Teachers and therapists should think of parents as the most valuable members of their team, now more than ever. Not just because we will never stop fighting for our kids, and not because we will prove to be the quickest of studies when it comes to learning about what our kids need, and not even because we have the ultimate incentive to get it right in a way that surpasses even the most dedicated speech language professional. Professionals would be well advised to welcome parents and end users into the process as equal partners because the world has changed, and we are making final choices now. How you as professionals feel about that is frankly becoming irrelevant. Adapt or perish. And teach us to make the best decisions we can, starting off by educating yourselves as to what those choices now include.

I will say that one of the most interesting objections to the current direction of AAC in regards to the iPad was one that I hadn’t thought about before, and which on reflection feels entirely valid. At one of the groups discussions I participated in, a participant said she found the current crop of AAC apps to be completely disappointing, primarily because they represented old thinking. Every single of of them, particularly the ones that have established themselves at the top of the field, have simply striven to replicate the experience of using a standard speech device on the iPad. She maintained that perhaps it’s not just the physical hardware that needs to be rethought, but rather the entire experience. A new approach to how that assisted speech might work, and a newer, deeper integration with social media.

The iPad and its competitors are cracking a door to the future of assisted communication. Perhaps it’s time for us to kick that door all the way open.

Nomad

June 11, 2012 in Community Wisdom, Featured by Robert Rummel-Hudson

I can still remember the first time I heard the term “nomad parenting”. I thought, “Holy crap. That’s us.”

Last week, I discussed how the future can be a scary place for parents of special needs kids. It has teeth and claws, the future monster, largely because it is almost entirely unpredictable. We try to anticipate the bad stuff and find a path to the good, dodge the worst and discover the hidden treasures. Most of all, when we get knocked into the sky, we try very hard to land on our feet, and in exactly the right spot.

We pack our bags and we look for the answers. We’ll never stop looking.

The first time we moved for Schuyler, it was without even a hint that she had a monster of her own. She was born in the mostly forgettable Detroit suburb of Royal Oak, Michigan, and we knew long before she arrived that we didn’t want to raise our child in Detroit. We ended up in New Haven, Connecticut, beginning what we thought would be a long-time New England adventure. By the time Schuyler was diagnosed three years later, we knew it wasn’t going to be our home for long. The much-touted Connecticut schools were surprisingly ill-prepared for a kid like Schuyler, and we had no family on the east coast.

We set our sights on Austin, Texas, a little blue island in a sea of red and a town with a number of schools oriented to children with disabilities, but in the end, it wasn’t a good fit. Schuyler’s school wasn’t ultimately ready to support the assistive technology solutions that we felt were the key to Schuyler’s future, so we ended up in the Dallas suburb of Plano, in a school system that seemed committed, deeply committed, to assistive technology as a part of Schuyler’s curriculum and her future. It felt like we’d finally stopped pursuing the future.

Now, seven years later, we’re taking up the chase again.

It’s not all the school’s fault. This is still a very strong school district, easily one of the best in Texas, and even though we’ve been deeply disappointed in the shift away from encouraging Schuyler’s use of an electronic speech solution, we’ve certainly appreciated their commitment to helping her. But as I explained last week, budget cutbacks and a change in philosophy has left Schuyler suddenly without in-school guidance with her AAC needs. Her teachers don’t understand AAC, they don’t get trained on it, and they don’t appreciate the connection between Schuyler’s expressive language and the ability to express herself clearly. A year or two ago, Schuyler’s spoken language was becoming clear enough to be understood by others, people who had maybe even just met her. Now, we as her parents find ourselves struggling to follow her spoken words, and her exasperation is clear. The one phrase we understand all too clearly is the sad sigh and a dejected “Never mind.” We hear it all too often.

When we talk about schools and whether or not a particular community might or might not work for our kids, there are some basic truths that we’ve learned the hard way. One of those is that the general quality of a school system probably tells you very little about how well it will take care of students with disabilities. Public schools in Connecticut are among the best in the country, after all, and yet in no other place was Schuyler treated quite so much like a disposable item. Austin, as both a city and an educational community, seemed like a natural fit for a kid who is anything but typical. And Plano schools have always been among the most well-funded and highest achieving in the country.

And yet at some level, they all failed Schuyler. They all failed a lot of kids, as do most educational institutions in this country. It’s a horribly depressing fact, but it’s true and every special needs parent reading this probably knows it. The students who succeed within the special education sphere in America do so because of extraordinary individual teachers or tenacious parents or the iron wills of the students themselves. Our schools are by and large failing kids with disabilities, and I actually believe they are doing so almost universally.

And that leaves us wondering what’s next, and where.

We’re done chasing schools, I believe. That’s turned out to be a sucker’s bet. We can move to communities that fit us and be failed by the schools, or we can move to towns where we feel like misfit toys, and still ultimately stumble with the schools. We can continue to raise Schuyler in a place where once she reaches an age where she might expect a certain amount of independence, she would be stranded forever by a pervasive car culture where mass transit is neither present nor particularly wanted. Or we can take her someplace where she might be able to live independently one day, where she could step on buses and trains and get to the places she wants to go. We can take her someplace where she can grow, someplace where she can experience a larger world than the one she’s already outgrowing.

We could take her to Chicago.

There’s more to this choice than hoping against hope for a better educational experience for Schuyler. I’ve accepted by now that we may never find that. If we couldn’t expect that from Plano, where we moved originally because there was an assistive technology team and a specific AAC class in place and foolishly believed this state of affairs would never change, then where can we hope to find it? The perfect school is a Shangri-La. It’s a four-leaf clover, something that can be sought in vain but may rather simply present itself by chance. The perfect educational setting may be as simple as one teacher who gives a damn.

There’s a lot to work out before this can happen, not the least of which is my need to find a job. (This is the place where I shameless beg anyone who may have connections in the Chicago area to please help me. I will happily send you my resume. Seriously. Hire me.) But when we sat down and really discussed this, it felt right. In the end, that’s the discussion that matters, the one that begins with “Are we really discussing moving AGAIN?” and ends with “Well, yes. Yes, I suppose we are.”

Julie and I both have compelling individual and personal reasons for wanting to move to Chicago, some of which have little to do with Schuyler. I guess we’re all three looking there for a chance for redemption. And truth be told, we’ve been nomads before. It is entirely possible that I’m chasing something impossible, something that doesn’t exist anywhere. A true nomad is at home in motion, and if there’s one thing that special needs parents understand, it is unpredictability, and transit.

And doing anything, doing everything, for love.

%d bloggers like this: