web analytics

There are side-effects to surviving

December 6, 2010 in Future Glimpse by Admin Dawn

Bee LavenderBee Lavender is the author of the award-winning memoir Lessons in Taxidermy: Diagnosed with cancer at age twelve and perilously pregnant at eighteen, surviving surgeries and violent accidents: Sometimes you can’t believe Bee Lavender is still alive; sometimes you think nothing could kill her. Lessons in Taxidermy is Lavender’s fierce and expressive search for truth and an elusive sense of safety. This autobiographical tale is stark and resolved, but strangely euphoric, tying together moments and memories into a frantic, delicate, and often transcendently funny account of anguish and confusion, pain and poverty, isolation and illusion. While staying conscious of the particulars of her circumstances, Lavender frames her life in the context of history, traveling, landscape, and freak show culture. Lessons in Taxidermy is apocryphal, troubling, cathartic, and important.

We interviewed Bee about her experiences to ask her what parents can do to help their children who are going through a medical crisis.

Children who have been seriously ill go to a place where they are absolutely alone and where their parents can’t follow. How can parents support their children as they face these very scary challenges?

The first and fundamental principle is simple: always tell the truth. No matter how difficult, unwieldy, or frightening, it is better by far to acknowledge what is actually happening. Yes, this is hard – especially if you are talking about painful and messy procedures, serious permanent disabilities, or the possibility of death. But even the youngest children have the capacity to understand what is happening, and developing a framework will help them cope with the process. Saying “this will hurt” is always better than pretending otherwise. Saying “we don’t know what will happen” is always better than promising a miracle that might not come.

Truth doesn’t hurt. Surgeries hurt.

In your book, you write about your ability to separate your body from your mind in an effort to deal with the pain of your cancer. Have you been able to come back to your physical self? Do you have thoughts about how parents can help their children retain that sense of self?

It is fair to say that sustained and routine trauma is not a desirable formative experience. In my particular case, I learned to compartmentalise. Pain and pleasure go in separate boxes, learning and love happen on their own. It took several years before I could even let the food on my plate touch, let alone the emotions or whatever you want to call the stuff boiling around in your brain and chest. I had to take small and incremental steps toward normal behaviour – the ability to think, yearn, fail, all at once, losing control, letting life happen, feeling it.

I still lack certain forms of empathy. I grasp that there are no hierarchies of suffering, yet I am dismissive of pain in myself and others. When my friends (or children) complain about something they find deeply important, I often catch myself thinking they should go get some real problems. Though at least I have learned to think it instead of saying it out loud.

There is no tidy way to help a kid in similar circumstances. There are side-effects to surviving.

How has being a writer helped you process your experience? Do you think parents should help their children journal (either via writing or pictures)?

From my earliest years I remember thinking that words were my friends, and putting them in a certain order to convey stories was a tremendous distraction from all manner of mayhem. From about age five or so I wrote fiction, and the activity was hugely entertaining and a much needed distraction. Other children might have a different set of needs, but I think that the desire for escape is valid and necessary.

Distraction, even obsession, can be better than therapy, when your life is organised around medical treatments. By the time I was eighteen years old I had several hundred surgical scars on my body and I would have rather stabbed myself in the eye than talk about my illness: dreary, boring, obnoxious illness! Cancer, cancer, cancer, ugh. Give me a movie, a concert, a new album to listen to, book to read…. art, literature, and politics offered solace and a way forward. For other people it might be sports, video games, knitting, whatever, just something external, something to think about other than the failures of the body.

I didn’t keep journals as a child, and never wrote directly about my illness until I was about 29. I don’t think it would have helped *me*, except to keep track of dates for later publication. In fact, I don’t think documenting the experience would have been especially healthy, because doing so would have been another way of assigning a privileged meaning. I think the most empowering thing is to learn to say “the disability is part of me, but it does not define me.”

Did you feel you had to protect your parents from your fears? Is there something they could have done to relieve some of that burden?

Yes, I wanted to protect them, and the need to do so was both explicit (I was told not to cry) and implied (being brave made it easier for everyone to play their part). I agreed with these values at the time and I still do. Life was seriously difficult for me, but my parents were there too. They had to watch me suffer, but they also had to deal with the administrative details, and pay the bills. Even now, with children of my own, I simply cannot imagine the anguish they were forced to endure. I was stoic, but my parents were heroic.

Decades later and thousands of miles away, my first thought when I have a medical appointment is how to prevent my mother worrying about me, or knowing at all. If I had one magical wish it would be to take away the pain that she suffered raising a sick kid. Both of my parents did their absolute best in a terrible situation, and asking for more – for niceties of behaviour or etiquette – is foolhardy at best.

The only way our collective burden could have been relieved was simple, and structural. My health insurance came from my mother’s job. The money to pay what the insurance didn’t cover came from the overtime both parents worked. I was literally alone, because they both had to work desperately hard – just to keep me alive.

The only thing that could have relieved our collective burden would have been universal health insurance. I believe that every citizen of a wealthy nation should have access to basic medical care. I moved to England six years ago because of the National Health Service, and I have no plans to move back home until health care reform is a reality instead of a promise. I do not want any of my loved ones to sacrifice their dreams to my illness.

Finally, medical issues force children to give up control of their bodies and their physical privacy in lots of ways. Do you have any thoughts about how parents can protect their children or give them some measure of autonomy given the reality of their medical needs?

In a purely practical sense this is an unobtainable goal. Whether you are talking about a crisis medical situation or long-term maintenance of a disability, you just can’t expect much privacy. Your body is being inspected for a reason, and the people looking are generally doing their best to help.

However, I do think there are limits. Speaking as someone with an “interesting” and rare disorder, there have been countless times when an examination seemed to be more for the prurient interest of staff than any clinical reason. Sometimes I have no choice but to cooperate, especially when using teaching hospitals. But I always make an effort to achieve at least a symbolic level of privacy.

This can be as simple as insisting on a curtain around the examination table, or an introduction to the people poking my flesh.

But privacy is more than just showing skin. It is about control, autonomy, narrative. The best thing that my parents did was allow me to own my story – to decide when and how to talk about the disease. Or not.

Eighty-five

July 21, 2010 in Loved Ones by Robert Rummel-Hudson

The Rummel Hudson FamilyEighty-five percent.

I’ve heard that figure for as long as I can remember, for as long as it was relevant in my life and the lives of my family.

Eighty-five percent of couples who have a child with a disability end up divorcing or splitting up. The number goes higher with the death of a child, I was told, but yeah. Eighty-five percent.

I can’t tell you how many times I heard this figure, from other families with a special needs child, or from a doctor or a therapist, or most often from the media itself. I ran across the eighty-five percent for years, but it wasn’t until after my book was released and my family was profiled by a Fox reporter from Houston named Greg Groogan that this statistic was called into question.

Greg had already done a number of stories focusing on disability issues, and his own child had special needs as well. As a result, he was familiar with that eighty-five percent figure. He’d heard it many times before.

Problem was, he couldn’t verify it.

“I’ve heard that figure so many times,” Greg said to me, “but I’ve looked for a report, any study at all that suggests a figure like that, and I just can’t find it. I can’t find any other statistics, either. But that number just seems to have appeared out of nowhere.”

I couldn’t explain it then, nor can I really make sense of it now, except to say that for parents of special kids, it’s not hard to believe that statistic. We don’t try to confirm or disprove it because when we hear that figure, something inside of us just says, “Yeah, that sounds about right.”

When I wrote my memoir, I felt that it was important to discuss my own failures and my own infidelity. My wife and I both strayed, although I was by far the most egregious offender, and looking back, some things jump out.

When you’re in a relationship with a partner and you have a child who is different, or even broken, it seems logical that your partner is going to be the person to whom you can turn when your situation becomes too much for you to face all at once. I’m not sure that’s entirely true, though. Sometimes staring across a table at someone who is just as sad and angry and confused and guilt-ridden as yourself is of small comfort.

Sometimes the flight impulse is overpowering. There are times when you simply can’t be that person, that parent. You need some Clark Kent time, and that’s just not possible some of the time, or even most of the time. The cape doesn’t get to come off very often.

I wish I knew the answers. Julie and I came back from that brink, but we didn’t do so unscathed. And we recognized that our daughter needed us both, and that the old advice that says “staying together for the sake of the kids is a bad idea,” well, that advice isn’t always necessarily true. Julie and I understood that, and we reshaped the narrative of our marriage to fit the reality of our world.

The marriages that work, the ones that survive the stress and the unknown of disability, I suspect that they are the ones where the standard rules and social narratives have been discarded, shattered, broken and reformed. They’ve endured because they found their own way. They make their own rules, they shape their own narratives and they make compromises and sacrifices that most people can’t even imagine.

In doing so, however, they are creating new worlds. If the families that make it are defying the odds, whether it’s that apocryphal eighty-five percent or not, they are also building family structures that exist beyond statistics, wholly original in their form and their operation.

It’s taken me a long time to make peace with the choices and the devil’s bargains we’ve made in order to dodge the eighty-five percent. I struggle with it now. But it’s what we do because it’s what we’ve been given to work with. And the rewards for us are indescribable.

Robert Rummel-Hudson’s first book, Schuyler’s Monster: A Father’s Journey with His Wordless Daughter, tells the story of raising a little girl with a disability and learning to become the father she needs.  It was published in February 2008 by St. Martin’s Press and was released in trade paperback in January 2009.

We profiled him in June in honor of Father’s Day.

%d bloggers like this: