web analytics

Getting Started in Special Education: First Steps

August 1, 2011 in Ask the Special Ed Lawyer, Featured, Insider Insight, Latest Articles by dianaglick

This first published in May 2010. It was Diana Glick’s 2nd article for us and it’s a terrific reminder right now – before regular session school starts – to start educating ourselves about the basics. If you get a chance read all of Diana’s articles from the start. Especially helpful is the one about what your legal team will need from you; should you ever have the need for one..

On a personal note, about Diana. She contacted me from my personal blog Kidneys and Eyes after I’d posted something about my son’s IEP. It was just a little advice; something to keep him mind. I wrote her back, thanked her and promptly asked her if she’d be willing to contribute to the site and she agreed without hesitation. Why? Why would a busy attorney want to write for a site like ours? Pure desire to educate parents navigating the maze of special education.

Thank you Diana!

————–

By Diana Glick

If you have decided to seek special education services for your child, you have likely traveled a long and often difficult journey already. Your child may have a longstanding medical diagnosis, or you may have been concerned about her performance in school and tried other interventions before getting to this point.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that I discussed in my introductory column has two major categories of services for disabled children: Part B and Part C. Part B will encompass the majority of our discussion of the legal perspective as it applies to school-age children; however, if you are the parent of a very young child with an already diagnosed disability, you should know that services are available to children aged 0-3 under Part C.

Early Intervention

Part C, also referred to as Early Intervention, is available to children with developmental and other disabilities from 0-36 months of age, and includes assessments and services. The services under Part C are provided in accordance with an Individualized Family Service Plan. Part C programs are available in all 50 states, but eligibility criteria vary significantly. If you are interested in seeking out programs for a child under three, the best place to start is at the website for the National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. This website contains information about what is available under Part C and provides Early Intervention contact information for each state.

After Early Intervention

Part B of the IDEA encompasses special education services for children ages 3 through 21, which are administered by local school districts. If you suspect that your child needs special education services, the first step is to request an assessment. It is best to make this request of the school principal and to do so in writing. Each state has different timelines for assessment. For example, in California, once the school receives a request for assessment, they have 15 days to provide parents with a written assessment plan. This is not the case in Ohio, where the school has up to 30 days to respond to a request for assessment. Federal law provides that the District must obtain your written consent to proceed with testing, which is typically done with an “assessment plan.” Once you have signed and returned the assessment plan, the District has 60 calendar days to conduct the assessments and convene and IEP meeting to discuss their findings, unless state law provides a different timeline.

Getting a response

What should you do if you make a written request and get no response? As an attorney, I often hear stories of difficult communication with schools and school district personnel. The last thing you want to do is get off on a bad foot with people who are there to help your child. On the other hand, it is frustrating to be ignored. If you are not getting a response from your child’s teachers or the school principal, the next step is to contact the school district’s special education director. This person is sometimes housed in the Student Services or the Special Services department. It is also important to conduct communication in writing and to start a binder with your child’s special education documentation. A well-organized binder helps you track your child’s course through special education and safeguard important documents. If you are having difficulty getting a response from the District to requests for an assessment, I recommend keeping a copy of all of your communications and having a school secretary or administrative assistant initial and date your copy to confirm the date of receipt.

In my next column, I will discuss the various eligibility categories and what parents can do when there is a disagreement about eligibility among the members of the IEP team. In future columns, I will also discuss alternatives to an IEP, such as 504 plans.

We are also interested in hearing from you! Feel free to suggest topics for further discussion; just keep in mind that I cannot provide legal advice for your specific situation.

Disclaimer:
This column reflects the views of Diana B. Glick in her individual capacity. It does not necessarily represent the views of her law firm or her clients, and is not sponsored or endorsed by them. The purpose of this column is to assist in dissemination of information about federal special education law, but no representation is made about the accuracy of the information. The information contained in this column is provided only as general information for education purposes, and topics may or may not be updated subsequent to their initial posting.
By using this column you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. This blog site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. This column is not intended to be advertising and Diana B. Glick does not seek to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blog site in a state where this blog site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Making videos instructional rather than mind numbing

January 17, 2011 in Ask the Occupational Therapist, Featured, Insider Insight by Dr. Tiffany Showalter

By: Dr. Tiffany G. Showalter, OTD, OTR/L

Have you ever noticed how many children with autism absolutely love watching videos? They can be heard reciting dialogue or even observed imitating behaviors long after the experience is over. This ability makes sense as it has been suggested that individuals with autism see things in “pictures”. I recently had a parent report that her child has motor planning issues when it comes to participation in gross and fine motor tasks, but has learned every dance that they do on Sesame Street. Wouldn’t it be a great idea if we could teach children using what they love the most?

Maybe we can! Video modeling is a teaching method used to develop and strengthen a variety of skills from communication to self-help. The targeted behaviors that the child is to learn are videotaped as a neuro-typical child performs them. Next, the child watches the video and is given the chance to memorize, imitate, and generalize those behaviors.

Some examples include computer animated learning or video instruction. I recently attended an Autism conference in my area where I participated in a session on this incredible method of instruction and was doubly excited to learn the incredible amount of research supporting it. My session described how researchers at a local state university were using IPODs to video tape and then show to children with difficulties in a variety of areas. Their success was remarkable and has inspired me to consider writing a mini grant proposal at the school where I work to try it out myself. I have also learned u-tube has a ton of videos already available for use.

I also attended a session on using video instruction to teach printing upper and lowercase letters. After watching the videos myself I have been hooked and using them since with great results for children regardless of disability.

So the next time your child demonstrates a problem with using good manners at the table, washing their hands, or tying their shoes, why not try video modeling?

Disclaimer: I hope you enjoyed reading this article. Please remember you are reading this information of your own free will and are taking the information at your own risk. The author is the legal copyright holder of this material it may not be used, reprinted, or published without my written consent. This information is for entertainment and informational purposes only and is not intended to provide or circumvent medical, legal or other professional advice.

Wading Through the Alphabet Soup: An Introduction to Federal Special Education Law

December 11, 2010 in Ask the Special Ed Lawyer by dianaglick

One of the first things I explain to clients during an initial intake appointment is the basic federal standard for educating students with disabilities. This is frequently referred to as the “alphabet soup” of special education: the IDEA mandates that schools provide FAPE in the LRE according to the child’s IEP. Keeping in mind that talking in acronyms is just job security for attorneys, let’s break it down:

IDEA = Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

This is the federal law ensuring that special education services are provided to children with one or more qualifying disabilities, whose disability interferes with their ability to receive an education. The IDEA originated in 1975 under President Ford and has been reauthorized and changed several times, most recently in 2004. While the IDEA is federal law and applies to all public school children in the country, each state also has its own education laws that may be slightly different than the federal requirements; states may provide more protections than those available under federal law, but may not provide fewer or less than the federal standard.

FAPE = Free Appropriate Public Education

The IDEA defines a free appropriate public education as special education and related services that are provided at no cost to parents and are in accordance with the child’s Individualized Education Plan (IEP), among other requirements. 20 U.S.C. 1401(9) (2009). The majority of legal disputes are about the meaning of “appropriate” for a child’s particular circumstances. In 1982, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Board of Education v. Rowley, which provides a working definition of FAPE as “a basic floor of opportunity” providing “some educational benefit.” Bd. of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 200 (1982).

What does “a basic floor of opportunity” mean in real terms? Because children who are eligible for special education have such a wide range of disabilities and needs, it cannot be defined as a specific set of services. However, most children who have passing grades or are making progress towards their IEP goals will be found to have received a basic floor of opportunity.

LRE = Least Restrictive Environment

This is one of the major improvements that the IDEA has made for students with disabilities. No longer does the law allow disabled children to be warehoused or educated exclusively in a special education setting, as long as their IEPs indicate some mainstream time during the school day. The LRE requirement has led to better outcomes, both academically and socially, for disabled students. It can also be a double-edged sword in some instances when parents are seeking a more restrictive environment for their child.

IEP = Individualized Education Plan

All students who are eligible for special education are to receive services in accordance with an IEP, which must be developed to meet the child’s individual needs. Those of you who already have some experience with special education have probably spent many hours at IEP meetings and have a sense of what they entail. We will talk more about IEPs in future columns.

I am excited to be included in this new community of families supporting children with special needs and look forward to sharing more of the legal perspective with you all. In future columns, I will address such topics as the difference between IEPs and 504 plans, discipline issues, assessments, the fair hearing process, private placements and knowing when to seek out legal help, among others.

We are also interested in hearing from you! Feel free to suggest topics for further discussion; just keep in mind that I cannot provide legal advice for your specific situation.

Author Diana B. Glick

Disclaimer:

This column reflects the views of Diana B. Glick in her individual capacity. It does not necessarily represent the views of her law firm or her clients, and is not sponsored or endorsed by them. The purpose of this column is to assist in dissemination of information about federal special education law, but no representation is made about the accuracy of the information. The information contained in this column is provided only as general information for education purposes, and topics may or may not be updated subsequent to their initial posting.

By using this column you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. This blog site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. This column is not intended to be advertising and Diana B. Glick does not seek to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blog site in a state where this blog site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

To Sign the IEP or Not to Sign — this is the question!

August 20, 2010 in Ask the Special Ed Lawyer, Insider Insight by dianaglick

Whew! You made it through the IEP meeting and are still standing. Now that the meeting is over, you are being asked to sign the IEP so the District may implement the proposed services, accommodations and goals. Should you sign or not? And, why does it matter?

Your Rights

The District must obtain your consent before providing the services indicated in the IEP. However, parents are under no obligation to sign the IEP, particularly if they disagree with its terms. Parents may sign, refuse to sign or authorize certain services without agreeing that the IEP provides your child a free appropriate public education.

The Ideal Scenario

Student raising her handIn the ideal IEP meeting, each of the following occurs:

* The designation makes sense and is back up by appropriate assessments
* Each of the professionals has given a report and there are offers of services that address all of your child’s areas of need
* There are measurable, understandable goals for each of your child’s areas of need
* If necessary, there are modifications and accommodations to the curriculum (homework, class work, testing) that will allow your child access
* The District has presented you with a written document reflecting all of these items, plus a narrative that contains the main points of discussion during the meeting.

When this kind of a meeting has occurred and you feel good about the outcome, by all means, give your consent. It is when one or more of these items is missing or has gone awry that you should consider not signing and instead developing a strategy to address the unresolved issues with the IEP team.

Your Options

Option 1: Sign the IEP. See you next year for the annual review!

Option 2: Authorize the implementation of goals and services, but do not agree that the IEP provides a free appropriate public education.

This is a very helpful middle option that can serve to move the process forward and extend protections to parents and student without compromising any potential legal claims in the future. It also serves to keep the conversation alive if there are items pending resolution. This response can be made with a simple sentence written on the signature page, or can be written up in a “Parents’ Addendum to the IEP,” which lays out your concerns in greater detail while still providing authorization to implement what the District has proposed.

Option 3: Do not sign at all.

Some parents opt to take the IEP home and review it carefully before signing it. This is a great idea if you would like some time to digest the information presented at the meeting and make sure you understand everything before signing. If you are satisfied with the document, make sure to sign and get it back to the District as soon as possible.

In other situations, parents fully disagree with some aspect of the IEP and do not want to provide their consent or authorization. If you find yourself in this situation, you will want to consider your next steps. Would you like to have another meeting to discuss specific aspects of your child’s program? Would you like to see revisions to the goals, more goals or perhaps fewer goals? Are there assessments necessary to determine what your child needs? Let the District know, preferably in writing, what you would like to see happen next and emphasize the importance of collaboration in getting an appropriate document with a plan to address your child’s needs.

Some Pitfalls of Not Signing

While not signing your child’s IEP is a right you have and one that can be exercised in the face of an inappropriate plan, there are some potential pitfalls you’ll want to be aware of as you are making your decision.

First, if this is an initial IEP finding your child eligible for special education, refusing to sign or authorize implementation means that your child is not yet considered eligible for special education. This may be important if your child is experiencing significant behavioral difficulties. As I will describe in greater detail when we talk about discipline, the IDEA provides special protections for children with IEPs when they have committed disciplinary infractions. If your child is racking up multiple suspensions, the safest course of action is to authorize the implementation of the IEP and agree in writing that your child is eligible while you continue to hammer out the details of the plan.

Second, if you decline to provide consent or authorization (no signature at all), the District is not legally able or required to implement the services offered in the IEP. For example, if the District is offering speech therapy for 30 minutes per week and you believe your child should get 60 minutes per week, it might be better to authorize the District’s offer of service while you continue to negotiate, instead of rejecting all services by not signing. If you refuse to agree to your child’s annual IEP, the District is required to provide the placement and services offered in the last IEP that you signed and that was implemented. If this is an initial IEP, there is fallback IEP to implement.

Finally, refusing to sign an IEP can create an atmosphere of tension among the members of the IEP team. The District wants and needs your signature in order to move forward and some of the team members may feel insulted or offended that you have refused to sign. This should not deter you from advocating for your child, but it’s good to understand how your actions could be perceived by the District. The most important thing you can do once you decide not to sign your child’s IEP is to keep the lines of communication open with the District and indicate clearly what you would like to see happen to resolve the conflict.

Disclaimer:

This column reflects the views of Diana B. Glick in her individual capacity. It does not necessarily represent the views of her law firm or her clients, and is not sponsored or endorsed by them. The purpose of this column is to assist in dissemination of information about federal special education law, but no representation is made about the accuracy of the information. The information contained in this column is provided only as general information for education purposes, and topics may or may not be updated subsequent to their initial posting.

By using this column you understand that this information is not provided in the course of an attorney-client relationship and is not intended to constitute legal advice. This blog site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. This column is not intended to be advertising and Diana B. Glick does not seek to represent anyone desiring representation based upon viewing this blog site in a state where this blog site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Stuck with feeding? Strategies for breaking free

May 28, 2010 in Ask the Feeding Specialist, Insider Insight, Latest Articles by Katja Rowell MD

Abby and her speech therapist were making major gains. She had mastered feeding herself, clapping and grinning, clearly proud of her accomplishments. Problem is, it all fell apart when Abby left her therapy center. Her parents tried bribes, rewards and begging, but Abby would simply refuse to eat unless she was nestled in Mom’s lap and spoon-fed.

Six-year-old Abby had been medically fragile, overcoming heart surgery and oral motor concerns. Mom had done a great job supporting and feeding her daughter over the years, but now at age six, the feeding practices that served them well were holding Abby back.

What can you do if you suspect you are stuck with feeding?

  • •  Utilize the team, bring in the latest information you are working from. Perhaps the advice from two months ago is no longer appropriate.
  • •  Find out if your child has adequate nutritional reserves to handle changes in feeding.
  • •  When appropriate, optimize feeding on a schedule, work on family meals. This will be the framework that will help Abby’s parents feel secure moving forward.
  • •  Explore your fears. Is it hard to let go of your notion of your child as medically fragile or incapable of feeding herself? Are you worried about a feeding tube? Voice your fears to the team. Believe them if they reassure you. (This assumes you have a good working relationship.)
  • •  Do you believe that if you pressure or push your child to eat more that they will grow better? Has this worked? Ask your feeding team to explain why pressure with feeding often backfires. (Studies show that overall, children who are pressured to eat do less well with eating and grow more slowly.)
  • •  Make sure that all care-givers involved are on the same page with any upcoming feeding changes. If Dad refuses to feed Abby, but Mom caves in, things won’t change.
  • •  Find a behaviorist or feeding specialist to work with. Get specific about how you are feeding. Are you eating with your child? Are you minimizing distractions? What kind of chair are you using? Is there a footrest, or soft belts to help center and focus your child? Bring in your utensils and plates. Sometimes having the right fork can make a huge difference.
  • •  What are you getting from feeding? Perhaps Abby and her mom get special cuddle time during meals? Explore, find other ways to connect, maybe keep the rituals if there is no harm, but be honest about your motivation. (My own daughter was not cuddly, so I held on to that last nighttime bottle longer than I “should” have, but there was no harm to her eating or health, and I needed that cuddle time! Eventually it became clear that it was time to give up the bottle and we did.)
  • •  Use your discipline techniques that work to enforce and teach behavior at the table. Be calm. Discipline behavior and not what or how much the child is eating. Ask the team or other parents for some ideas on this.
  • •  Center yourself before a meal. Food, nourishment, the “threat” of a “failure to thrive diagnosis,” and behavior challenges can all combine to make mealtime a high-stress, high-anxiety experience. Your child will pick up on this. Sit down, take a few deep breaths. Try to be pleasant and calm.
  • •  Have a game plan for making changes. Some thoughts for Abby who has the understanding and skills to work on change:
  • •  Start with breakfast (you know more snacks and meals are coming.) Be calm but firm with expectations. Do not feed Abby.
  • •  Be very reliable about offering balanced foods, with a mix of finger foods and spoon foods every 3-4 hours.
  • •  Get support. Check in with your team. If intake truly is a concern and she eats well for others in the care team, consider sharing duties during the transition.
  • •  Watch for small victories, but celebrate them in your head. Some kids view any praise or reward as pressure and will back off. Tailor your approach to what works with your child.
  • •  If positive reward works well, go for it. For Abby, all the offers of stickers and cheering may have slowed things down. Having the calm expectation of mastery might help.
  • •  Don’t focus on who is eating what. Talk to Dad or Big Sis. Abby might just pick up that spoon when no one is looking.
  • •  Give the new plan at least three days and longer if Abby has the nutritional reserve! Many parents lose their nerve about twenty minutes into a meal…
  • •  Understand normal growth and development (See chapter 2 of Child of Mine online at www.ellynsatter.com) so that you know it’s normal to eat small amounts some meals, and larger amounts at others. Allow children the time and space to learn to tune in to hungry and full if they are able. (Children with pain, or other underlying medical issues may have a harder time with this.)

Building Relationships with Special Ed Teachers & Schools

May 19, 2010 in From Julia, Latest Articles by Julia Roberts

As we are ending our school year, I’m thinking back to the last several months and what our family and most especially our kids have endured. A life-saving transplant for our daughter and days/weeks missed from school for medical testing and recovery and a mental breakdown for our son that culminated in his hospitalization in a psychiatric hospital.

Our public school, who already knew us well because of 6 years of education for our kids, readily supported us through it all. From administration to teachers, they all took an active part in our family’s recovery from the kidney transplant and subsequent mental illness diagnosis and treatment.

I’m often asked about our relationship with our school and special ed department and I am the first one to sing their praises. They are a dedicated, caring group of people with whom we would have likely not done as well as a family in crisis (or two) without their support.

The relationships are built out of mutual respect; their respect for me as the kids’ parent and mine for them as experienced educators. My relationship with them has grown and changed and I’m proud of how well we work together for the kids.

There’s nothing mystical about how well we work together. Like I said, mutual respect for each other.

But it’s not been without planning, tenacity, communication, and giving.

What I have done and what do I do to keep our relationship going in the right direction?

- I respect their knowledge. I have not taught children or children with challenges in the classroom. And in fact, could not, so I am not silent about that fact. I often give them sincere kudos for what they do and what they know.

- If I have a concern I put it in writing and if I feel we need a meeting, I ask for one with the parties that should be involved. I try to have a list of items I’d like to address and I try to send those ahead so they can prepare. I also will bring a list of questions and concerns with me.

-If I have a concern about a certain aspect of learning (we recently asked the school system to do psychological testing for Gage because it had never been done and since he was hospitalized I wanted to see how they could better help him learn) I ask them for options and I am usually prepared for what is available (but not always!).

- I try to make it convenient  on them for meetings. I try my best to be flexible, even if that means I have to be there at 7:15am (if you know me, you know I don’t like early morning meetings!).

- I tell the administration about the good work the teachers are doing. I send notes thanking teachers after successes. I have also sent thank you notes after discussions for changes in IEPs and for their willingness to try anything (the number of changes they’ve made for Gage would amaze you.) that might help my kids learn. I thank them a lot for being open to ideas!

- I give thoughtful gifts. I don’t spend a fortune. I might make something or buy something small, or include a gift card but it is always accompanied by a heartfelt note from me expressing how grateful I am and sometimes a picture from one of the kids.

- I’m involved in school. There are many ways I could be involved with school but I choose to handle Teacher Appreciation Week. It’s a week long thank you of trinkets and gifts and lunch and I spend a lot of time planning and executing it (with a co-chair, thank goodness). And even though it’s for all the teachers and staff, I often think of it as my personal way to show out team my appreciation. And my work there doesn’t go unnoticed. It means something to them that I am involved. I am not saying everyone needs to run a week long event, but there are many small things you can do all year long for the school…make copies for the classes, distribute mail, cover the front office phones once a week during lunch, just to name a few. Me being up there and visible makes it easy for quick conversations. It shows I’m engaged.

I do not have an adversarial relationship with anyone at the school. Have I hit it off completely with everyone? Not necessarily. Have I rubbed people the wrong way? Um, yes. But if I follow my rule for treating them with respect that usually gets us through and we come out better in the long run working together.

%d bloggers like this: