web analytics

There are side-effects to surviving

December 6, 2010 in Future Glimpse by Admin Dawn

Bee LavenderBee Lavender is the author of the award-winning memoir Lessons in Taxidermy: Diagnosed with cancer at age twelve and perilously pregnant at eighteen, surviving surgeries and violent accidents: Sometimes you can’t believe Bee Lavender is still alive; sometimes you think nothing could kill her. Lessons in Taxidermy is Lavender’s fierce and expressive search for truth and an elusive sense of safety. This autobiographical tale is stark and resolved, but strangely euphoric, tying together moments and memories into a frantic, delicate, and often transcendently funny account of anguish and confusion, pain and poverty, isolation and illusion. While staying conscious of the particulars of her circumstances, Lavender frames her life in the context of history, traveling, landscape, and freak show culture. Lessons in Taxidermy is apocryphal, troubling, cathartic, and important.

We interviewed Bee about her experiences to ask her what parents can do to help their children who are going through a medical crisis.

Children who have been seriously ill go to a place where they are absolutely alone and where their parents can’t follow. How can parents support their children as they face these very scary challenges?

The first and fundamental principle is simple: always tell the truth. No matter how difficult, unwieldy, or frightening, it is better by far to acknowledge what is actually happening. Yes, this is hard – especially if you are talking about painful and messy procedures, serious permanent disabilities, or the possibility of death. But even the youngest children have the capacity to understand what is happening, and developing a framework will help them cope with the process. Saying “this will hurt” is always better than pretending otherwise. Saying “we don’t know what will happen” is always better than promising a miracle that might not come.

Truth doesn’t hurt. Surgeries hurt.

In your book, you write about your ability to separate your body from your mind in an effort to deal with the pain of your cancer. Have you been able to come back to your physical self? Do you have thoughts about how parents can help their children retain that sense of self?

It is fair to say that sustained and routine trauma is not a desirable formative experience. In my particular case, I learned to compartmentalise. Pain and pleasure go in separate boxes, learning and love happen on their own. It took several years before I could even let the food on my plate touch, let alone the emotions or whatever you want to call the stuff boiling around in your brain and chest. I had to take small and incremental steps toward normal behaviour – the ability to think, yearn, fail, all at once, losing control, letting life happen, feeling it.

I still lack certain forms of empathy. I grasp that there are no hierarchies of suffering, yet I am dismissive of pain in myself and others. When my friends (or children) complain about something they find deeply important, I often catch myself thinking they should go get some real problems. Though at least I have learned to think it instead of saying it out loud.

There is no tidy way to help a kid in similar circumstances. There are side-effects to surviving.

How has being a writer helped you process your experience? Do you think parents should help their children journal (either via writing or pictures)?

From my earliest years I remember thinking that words were my friends, and putting them in a certain order to convey stories was a tremendous distraction from all manner of mayhem. From about age five or so I wrote fiction, and the activity was hugely entertaining and a much needed distraction. Other children might have a different set of needs, but I think that the desire for escape is valid and necessary.

Distraction, even obsession, can be better than therapy, when your life is organised around medical treatments. By the time I was eighteen years old I had several hundred surgical scars on my body and I would have rather stabbed myself in the eye than talk about my illness: dreary, boring, obnoxious illness! Cancer, cancer, cancer, ugh. Give me a movie, a concert, a new album to listen to, book to read…. art, literature, and politics offered solace and a way forward. For other people it might be sports, video games, knitting, whatever, just something external, something to think about other than the failures of the body.

I didn’t keep journals as a child, and never wrote directly about my illness until I was about 29. I don’t think it would have helped *me*, except to keep track of dates for later publication. In fact, I don’t think documenting the experience would have been especially healthy, because doing so would have been another way of assigning a privileged meaning. I think the most empowering thing is to learn to say “the disability is part of me, but it does not define me.”

Did you feel you had to protect your parents from your fears? Is there something they could have done to relieve some of that burden?

Yes, I wanted to protect them, and the need to do so was both explicit (I was told not to cry) and implied (being brave made it easier for everyone to play their part). I agreed with these values at the time and I still do. Life was seriously difficult for me, but my parents were there too. They had to watch me suffer, but they also had to deal with the administrative details, and pay the bills. Even now, with children of my own, I simply cannot imagine the anguish they were forced to endure. I was stoic, but my parents were heroic.

Decades later and thousands of miles away, my first thought when I have a medical appointment is how to prevent my mother worrying about me, or knowing at all. If I had one magical wish it would be to take away the pain that she suffered raising a sick kid. Both of my parents did their absolute best in a terrible situation, and asking for more – for niceties of behaviour or etiquette – is foolhardy at best.

The only way our collective burden could have been relieved was simple, and structural. My health insurance came from my mother’s job. The money to pay what the insurance didn’t cover came from the overtime both parents worked. I was literally alone, because they both had to work desperately hard – just to keep me alive.

The only thing that could have relieved our collective burden would have been universal health insurance. I believe that every citizen of a wealthy nation should have access to basic medical care. I moved to England six years ago because of the National Health Service, and I have no plans to move back home until health care reform is a reality instead of a promise. I do not want any of my loved ones to sacrifice their dreams to my illness.

Finally, medical issues force children to give up control of their bodies and their physical privacy in lots of ways. Do you have any thoughts about how parents can protect their children or give them some measure of autonomy given the reality of their medical needs?

In a purely practical sense this is an unobtainable goal. Whether you are talking about a crisis medical situation or long-term maintenance of a disability, you just can’t expect much privacy. Your body is being inspected for a reason, and the people looking are generally doing their best to help.

However, I do think there are limits. Speaking as someone with an “interesting” and rare disorder, there have been countless times when an examination seemed to be more for the prurient interest of staff than any clinical reason. Sometimes I have no choice but to cooperate, especially when using teaching hospitals. But I always make an effort to achieve at least a symbolic level of privacy.

This can be as simple as insisting on a curtain around the examination table, or an introduction to the people poking my flesh.

But privacy is more than just showing skin. It is about control, autonomy, narrative. The best thing that my parents did was allow me to own my story – to decide when and how to talk about the disease. Or not.

My Baby Rides the Short Bus

August 9, 2010 in Book Reviews by Admin Dawn

Sarah Talbot

Sarah Talbot

We’re excited to host a whole week featuring My Baby Rides the Short Bus, a terrific anthology co-edited by Jennifer Silverman, Yantra Bertelli and Sarah Talbot that Maximum Rock and Roll says, “will make you cry with laughter, empathy and solidarity.” We reached out to Jen, who helped us connect with her c0-editors Yantra and Sarah, to talk about how the book came to be. Whether you’re a wannabe writer or a book worm, we thought you’d be interested in learning what goes into crafting a book that has many authors.

Can you tell us how the anthology came about? Whose idea was it and how did she come up with it? How did she find the other editors and invite them along?

We became friends on the on-line community hipmama.com. In 2004 some individuals from that community put together a conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota and we all attended that conference and led a workshop for parents raising children with special needs. From that experience we put together a one-time zine, and from the zine ideas for the book flourished. Though the process was a shared venture, Jen Silverman was the one that said, “Hey, lets do this!” and pushed us along. (Yantra)

The zine was a good experience, but it felt like we had more stories to tell and so many more voices to hear from, and a book was the best way to reach a larger audience. (Jennifer)

How did you find the contributors?

We all were part of a writing community and knew individuals from all over that we could ask to write for the book. We also put out a call for submissions on special needs listservs, hipmama.com, and other writing email lists. We asked the people we knew to spread the word. We were lucky to receive great submissions. (Yantra)

What was the hardest thing about choosing the essays? Can you tell us some about the process?

Having enough essays to select from was our first concern. We called writers that we knew and friends of friends and asked them to write pieces for the anthology. We also approached individuals who already had an on-line presence that one or more of us were familiar with. We put out a call for submissions and extended the deadline a couple of times to widen the pool. In some ways Autism brought us together the first time around and we had to keep this in mind so our anthology didn’t focus on the autism voice too much. We worked with many of our authors to help edit and develop their original drafts to highlight differing experiences. (Yantra)

Jen Silverman

Jen Silverman

Can you also talk some about editing together? Were their times where one of you was championing a specific essay?

Initially we read all the contributions and decided together which ones we wanted to accept, which ones we would ask for rewrites from, and we collectively identified the essays thatdid not work for us. After this process we divided up the groups and we each took a section of the essays to work with the authors on editing. We decided on the final groups of essays to present to the publisher. Then we divided the essays up again into chapters and we each took chapters, wrote the introductions of those chapters, and worked on the final edits with our authors. We did have a couple of essays that we discussed a lot and some we decided to let go of, some we asked the authors if they were up to submitting something totally different, and others we ended up keeping in the anthology. In the end we were all happy with the final collection. (Yantra and Sarah)

We worked on the project, from initial query to finished product for almost three years, though the bulk of the work was in the last year and a half. All of our shared editing work took place over email or phone calls with plenty of background noise between the three of us. The book was truly collaborative and we each developed relationships with the authors we were working with directly, which was a bonus. (Jennifer)

How did you find your agent and/or a publisher? What were some specific challenges you had in this?

We didn’t have an agent, and were very lucky that we know some great people who were willing to help us along the way. I had queried a publisher I knew through some activist work I had done about the book, and while he didn’t publish us he helped with the process of putting a substantial book proposal together. The proposal went to a handful of places, maybe three, and although they rejected it, the feedback we got was very encouraging. After a few months it sitting on the shelf, a friend of mine mentioned the book proposal to a bookstore owner we knew, who passed it on to PM Press, which was just starting up and acquiring titles. They offered to publish it, and we happily accepted. Now I know how fortunate we really were to have had such an easy time finding a publisher, but I think that also speaks to the void in parenting literature that we were trying to fill. (Jennifer)

What has the response been like? Have you experienced any criticism for having an irreverent point of view?

The book has been well received. We have not heard much criticism. I don’t think we realized just how much parents and professionals working with individuals with special needs had been waiting for a book like ours until we interacted with the audiences. There is a lot of what-you-should-be-doing or what-you-should-have-done literature out there. Caring for all children takes a good deal of work, but it also seems to foster irreverence. Seeing disability through humor humanizes the experiences of disabled people and their caregivers. The parents we’ve come into contact with seem to appreciate that the books addresses a whole complex picture. It aims for humor and does not gloss over grief. (Yantra and Sarah)

Speaking of irreverence, can you talk about the taboos around writing about and talking about your experiences parenting a child with disabilities?

Many of our contributors struggled with telling their children’s stories. We’ve asked if this is our place. Are we some how taking away our kid’s own unique voices? And some of us are raising children who struggle with communication, who will probably never relay their stories to us, their parents, let alone to individuals outside our worlds. However, when it really comes down to it, we are not telling our children’s stories, we are telling our own. We can only really explore how our children’s realities influence us. (Yantra)

We talk in the foreword about being put on pedestals, and how there was a need to break down that stereotype of special needs parenting. It’s incredibly hard work to raise a kid with disabilities, and a lot of the time it feels like people want to simply see us as saints or talk about how strong we are without acknowledging that we’re human, fallible, and often at loose ends. I think that the unique voices of the contributors in the book contribute to breaking the notion that we’re destined for sainthood. (Jennifer)

Yantra Bertelli

Yantra Bertelli

What’s in the works for you all now?

We’re beginning to consider a follow-up anthology. We’re interested in the unique challenges of taking care of older and adult children with disabilities, and of the perspectives of parents whose children have died. My Baby Rides the Short Bus had a lot more essays about parenting small children than it did older ones, and as medicine changes, many more children with disabilities are living longer, fuller lives. We’re interested in what that means for their parents. We’re also interested in what it means to be the parent of a child who is no longer living – especially when caring for that child was complicated and involved due to their disability. (Sarah)

I contributed an essay to an anthology called Moms Gone Mad (Demeter Press, 2011) about the disproportionate burden of caregiving placed on mothers of kids with disabilities. Like Sarah said, we’re thinking about whether we can pull this off again with another book—people have been asking about a sequel. (Jennifer)

Thanks to HortenseJones on flickr for the shot we used on the front page for this article!

%d bloggers like this: