I see you. I see what you’re doing.
I hate it when this stuff sneaks up on me.
It was fairly late in the evening a few days ago. I had CNN on because the world was going nuts and I wanted to at least be aware of it in real time, but I wasn’t watching all that carefully. A reporter was speaking to host Don Lemon about how the White House is beginning to make excuses for President Trump’s behavior. And then suddenly he had my complete attention.
“That’s the best defense the White House has got. ‘Don’t blame him, he’s a special needs kid, he doesn’t know what he’s doing, he’s kind of slow, you know, there’s a learning curve, he’s incompetent.’ When that’s your fallback for the President of the United States, where does that leave the country?”
I think I responded out loud. “Oh, come on. Really?”
For the record, the program was CNN Tonight, and the reporter making this astute observation was Michael Weiss, CNN Investigative Reporter for International Affairs. I don’t know much about him; even that little description was copied directly from his Twitter bio. Like so many other public figures, my introduction to Mr. Weiss, and my lasting impression of him, was hearing him using young people like my daughter as an insult, a more hipster cool way to call someone stupid. A punchline.
I’ve written about this kind of thing before, where a dehumanizing remark is made by an entertainer or an athlete or, I don’t know, anyone in the public eye who should know better. It happens, a lot, and when it does we all stand up and make noise and link to the pledge to stop using the R-Word. We start trouble on social media and maybe get an apology, or at least a fauxpology, but probably not.
We push back against ableist speech, over and over again, because we hope, against all the evidence to the contrary, that things might get better. And they did just a little, for a while, I think. And then a candidate for the presidency made fun of a reporter with a disability, and the citizens of this country saw the video of his grotesque behavior and decided that yeah, that’s our guy. And while that at least gave us a platform for advocating for disability rights, particularly at the Democratic National Convention, it also gave people license to say and do terrible things about and to our loved ones. So in the balance, things probably don’t change all that much after all.
This time, the remark bugged me a little more than most. One reason is probably because the joke was made at the expense of “special needs kids”. No R-Word, no hate speech, no “hyuk hyuk hyuk” laugh track, no obvious villainy. Instead, it was at the hands of a mainstream media reporter, using innocuous terminology. Great, now everyone gets to laugh at “special needs kids”, too. Even more egregiously, neither the reporter nor the network actually realized the offense of what he said. CNN tweeted a link to the sound bite, and Weiss retweeted it. As of 24 hours later, it’s still there.
Interestingly, about a year ago, Weiss apparently tweeted critically about Trump’s reprehensible behavior towards New York Times reporter Serge Kovaleski. I’m not sure what this says about him, except that his outrage on behalf of people with disabilities seems to extend to circumstances of convenience, expiring at the point when he wants to sound cute while using kids with disabilities to snark at the president.
This isn’t a big deal, not on its own. We already knew that ableism is bipartisan. We already knew that outrage is circumstantial. We already understood that there’s a place waiting under the bus for our kids to be thrown when convenient.
But I’m making noise about this again. Because I can’t change this rotten mushy spot in the apple of our society, hidden under shiny, lying skin. But I can tell those who engage in this behavior that I see them. That’s not much, perhaps, and it’s certainly not enough. But it’s what I’ve got, so it’s what I do.
Note: To support the site we make money on some products, product categories and services that we talk about on this website through affiliate relationships with the merchants in question. We get a small commission on sales of those products.That in no way affects our opinions of those products and services.
I agree that his language is offensive and othering. I would expect someone with his language abilities to do a better job expressing his disdain towards our incompetent Commander in Chief. I just never honestly know where to draw the line. I mean, I don’t quite know how to feel if someone refers to someone (like Trump! Or that annoying co-worker or the parent on your kids hockey team who won’t stop complaining…etc.) as an idiot. Or a moron. Or having a low I.Q. These feel the same…but different. Thoughts?
To be fair, I think Weiss is just accurately representing Trump’s defenders’ argument: “The man has difficulty comprehending all the information and nuance a president needs to in real time! He’s not a greedy, corrupt scumbag who’s trying to profit off the presidency while avoiding any task he finds boring or difficult, he has a cognitive disability! So everyone should stop criticizing him!”
So in what way does that make it okay for him to use kids with disabilities that way? He’s not quoting anyone. He’s still using intellectual disability as an insult and a punchline. If anything, that makes it worse.
I don’t see it as an insult at “special needs kids”; rather, he’s mocking Trump’s handlers for using that as their excuse.
They’re essentially conceding that Trump is unqualified for his position. THAT’S the punchline, not the special needs part.
Except again, he’s not actually quoting anyone. He’s looking for a fictional punchline to represent an attitude, which is fine. But in using special needs kids, he’s re-enforcing ableist hate speech to do so. As a Progressive, I find that particularly galling. Because again, he’s not quoting anyone. He’s saying “This is the kind of thing they’re probably saying” and then inserting what he thinks would be insulting language. He’s making that association, not any particular member of the Trump team, and even if it’s probably accurate and even if it’s likely true, he’s the one making that association.
It’s not better or excusable if people with whom we agree do it. I’d argue it’s much worse.
Okay. So how do you think Michael Weiss should have expressed that perception instead?
(The site won’t let me thread any further, sorry.)
“Okay. So how do you think Michael Weiss should have expressed that perception instead?”
I’m not sure I understand the question. Is it somehow imperative to his point that there be a perception of Trump behaving like a “special needs kid”? You’re stating it in terms of that perception being valid. It’s not. The president isn’t behaving like a child with an intellectual disability. There’s not an inevitable comparison. Why are kids with disabilities being dragged into this at all? Why is that even a part of the discussion?
It’s a faulty and dehumanizing thing to express in the first place. There’s no reason for him to even go there, particularly since (surprisingly) he’s not quoting a sentiment that anyone on the Trump team actually expressed. So again, that perception is HIS, as is the choice to express it in terms of how he thinks the president’s behavior is like that of a child with special needs.
This seems like a weird hill to defend.